As a straight guy, I've always loved scenes in movies and on TV in which men find themselves, against their will, in their underwear in front of sexy and/or powerful women. Nudity like so-called CFNM is a bore. The above scene from the TV show, "Without a Trace," is great. The fact that he ends up on stage with a spotlight, just re-enforces the embarrassment and sense of despair as he's made a fool of. For a guy to be thoroughly humiliated and turned into an unwillingly public spectacle, underwear is where it's at. NOTHING ELSE COMPARES! I just wish these scenes contained more women with extended screen time on their reactions (shock, laughter, empathy, awkwardness, ect.) There are plenty of such scenes with boxers, as well as the tighty whities that predominate this site. A few come to mind, especially from some of those classic sitcoms from the 1960's. Just curious: Are there any other straight guys on this site who have the same "underwear humiliation fetish" (for lack of a better word)?
Thanks for your response. That's been my "read" on the issue. It seems to be more of a so-called "fetish" for gay men, and as expected, they seem to find it hot when the men are embarrassed in the presence of other men. As a straight guy, I only find it "hot" when the guy is embarrassed in front of women, only. But I've wondered for years if other straight guys had this is so-called "fetish." My limited "research" tends to indicate that it's not common among straight guys, even though the humiliated guy is in the presence of women.
I've got a similar fetish... Like the underwear humiliation or being exposed BUT in front of other guys... Any guy that'd enjoy or appreciate it for some reason, even gay guys... And I consider myself straight; maybe bi because of this... Women don't usually see the fun or sexiness in a guy being exposed, seems more negative or oppressed... Other straight guys don't care what you're (not) wearing and gay guys are cool (enjoy) seeing whatever
Interesting point by you, if I comprehended correctly. As I am straight, for me the only scenario is "straight male being humiliated in front of straight women." When you say "exposed," I assume you mean underwear as opposed to nudity - which, in my opinion - is less embarrassing than the guy finding himself in his underwear, in front of women. Nothing is more embarrassing than underwear. Such scenes have been in movies and TV shows for decades. Some of the earliest movies in cinematic history have contained scenes in which a guy somehow finds himself without the benefit of his trousers, while he's surrounded by cackling ladies. It's classic, and although the basic premise is always the same (guy in his underwear, embarrassed, because women are present), the variations are limitless.
From a societal perspective, such scenes are generally supposed to funny. That's almost always the reason for them, and I certainly have always understood the comedic component in such scenes/scenarios. But for me, personally, the erotic emotions evoked by such seemingly innocuous scenarios are decidedly overwhelming. My opinion is likely in the minority, but….whatever. I agree with you entirely, that women, generally, don't view a guy caught in his undies as particularly "sexy." If the women in such scenes ever reacted with a "sexual attraction" to the pantsless guy in question, it would not evoke such emotions. But when the ladies in said situations react with one of the two following (which is almost always the case), the erotic nature of the scene is simply off-the-charts: Laughter/giggling -- OR -- empathy for the poor guy. I think the sense of humiliating vulnerability is a factor.
When she reacts to his unfortunate and embarrassing public circumstances with laughter or stifled giggling, the guy has been reduced to a form of amusement. He's now a spectacle and has been made of fool of by cruel fate, through no fault of his own. Just by being there to witness his angst and embarrassment, she has, without conscious effort, subordinated him to a position of near helplessness and utter vulnerability. Example: If a secretary accidentally walked in on her high-powered boss while he was changing and got an unintended long look of him in his full-cut white briefs, evoking giggling from her, before the boss dives behind his desk in a vain attempt to recover his dignity as well as his pants, that boss would have a hard time giving his secretary orders and correction in the future. The incident, itself, would chip away at his authority position as "boss." Societally, that's just how it is. Unspoken, yet undeniable. If push came to shove, all she'd have to do is give him a gentle reminder of that fateful day or give him a playful wink, and he'd remember the incident with all the humiliating details. She would have the upper hand for the remainder of her employment.
If the women in such scenarios react to the poor guy with empathy, in a sincere effort to assuage his embarrassment and perhaps even rectify the situation, that would be even more humiliating for the guy. Talk about despair! Not only has his worst nightmare come true (in is underwear in front of scores of women), but the living, breathing reasons for his embarrassment (the ladies) are now doing everything they can to restore his dignity with their stoic professionalism. Talk about being emotionally emasculated! YIKES!!! And after it's over, the guy, deep down inside, knows that despite the ladies' kind, well-intentioned efforts to not embarrass him as his public humiliation was unfolding in living color --- when the women are alone, they'll be laughing uncontrollably amongst themselves, recounting his nightmare. Of course any and all "underwear humiliation" is exponentially worse if the guy has to see the women after the incident (classmates, colleagues at work, in-laws, ect).
As a gay guy with this fetish, I find any scene where a guy is pantsed and humiliated to be appealing to some extent.
But I admit that I do prefer scenes where a guy’s underwear is exposed in front of other guys, as opposed to in front of girls. And I think that’s because, from my own interpretation, you can usually assume that the reaction of the other guys is based on the type of underwear that they themselves are currently wearing or would be willing to wear at some point.
So, as an example, the guys in the audience who laugh mercilessly at Kirby Morris in this scene are probably doing so because they are wearing boxers and would never be caught dead in briefs. But if you saw a guy whose teasing and laughing was more subdued, you could assume that he may be less willing to mock because he himself either currently has on briefs or sometimes wears briefs.
Of course, you could also wonder if a guy who laughs mercilessly when another guy is seen wearing tighty whities is only laughing so that he does not draw attention to the fact that he also wears tighty whities himself.
As a gay guy with an underwear/pantsing/humiliation fetish, the idea of seeing other guys react to a type of underwear that they see another guy wearing and interpreting their reaction as an indication of their own preferred type of underwear is always interesting and fun for me. So, I’m much more drawn to scenes where guys are pantsed in front of other guys.
It's noteworthy that the storyline is attributed to two women, according to a cast/crew information listing. They concocted quite an astonishingly humiliating scene for the guy, replete with briefs, a stage, bright lights and a roaring audience, which laughs him off the stage. And of course, the scene would have been watered down had a guy introduced him. His female colleague at the podium is the icing on his night of humiliation. Despite the fact that women seem to often react with a healthy dose of "indifference" or perhaps dismiss such male embarrassment with an eye roll, down deep inside, they indeed know that such a scenario is humiliating beyond belief for the poor guy in question.
This scene is incredible! Poor Kirby! I wonder if he usually wears boxers and was just all out of clean ones that day or if he usually prefers briefs. Also wonder if the bullies pantsed him because they knew he would be wearing briefs (like maybe they saw him changing earlier for gym class) or if they expected him to be wearing boxers and it was just icing on the cake for them that he would be seen by the whole school in Tighty Whities.
I wonder how the bullies managed to get his clothes off, since I can't imagine that his suit was easy to pull off, especially the pants, which must've been held up by a belt. That seems like a lot of work that they would've had to do in order to get all of those clothes off of him and get him back out on the stage in his tighty whities, all with just a few seconds to get it done.
I also wonder if the bullies knew that he would have on tighty whities or if they expected that he'd be wearing boxers and were surprised to find out that he had on briefs (even if they were probably happy about it, since it would mean that he would likely be even more embarrassed).
Dude! You're awesome!
ReplyDeleteAs a straight guy, I've always loved scenes in movies and on TV in which men find themselves, against their will, in their underwear in front of sexy and/or powerful women. Nudity like so-called CFNM is a bore. The above scene from the TV show, "Without a Trace," is great. The fact that he ends up on stage with a spotlight, just re-enforces the embarrassment and sense of despair as he's made a fool of. For a guy to be thoroughly humiliated and turned into an unwillingly public spectacle, underwear is where it's at. NOTHING ELSE COMPARES! I just wish these scenes contained more women with extended screen time on their reactions (shock, laughter, empathy, awkwardness, ect.) There are plenty of such scenes with boxers, as well as the tighty whities that predominate this site. A few come to mind, especially from some of those classic sitcoms from the 1960's. Just curious: Are there any other straight guys on this site who have the same "underwear humiliation fetish" (for lack of a better word)?
ReplyDeleteI have the same fetish ( think its hot in front of men or women) but I'm gay
DeleteThanks for your response. That's been my "read" on the issue. It seems to be more of a so-called "fetish" for gay men, and as expected, they seem to find it hot when the men are embarrassed in the presence of other men. As a straight guy, I only find it "hot" when the guy is embarrassed in front of women, only. But I've wondered for years if other straight guys had this is so-called "fetish." My limited "research" tends to indicate that it's not common among straight guys, even though the humiliated guy is in the presence of women.
DeleteOh, well.
I've got a similar fetish... Like the underwear humiliation or being exposed BUT in front of other guys... Any guy that'd enjoy or appreciate it for some reason, even gay guys... And I consider myself straight; maybe bi because of this... Women don't usually see the fun or sexiness in a guy being exposed, seems more negative or oppressed... Other straight guys don't care what you're (not) wearing and gay guys are cool (enjoy) seeing whatever
ReplyDeleteInteresting point by you, if I comprehended correctly. As I am straight, for me the only scenario is "straight male being humiliated in front of straight women." When you say "exposed," I assume you mean underwear as opposed to nudity - which, in my opinion - is less embarrassing than the guy finding himself in his underwear, in front of women. Nothing is more embarrassing than underwear. Such scenes have been in movies and TV shows for decades. Some of the earliest movies in cinematic history have contained scenes in which a guy somehow finds himself without the benefit of his trousers, while he's surrounded by cackling ladies. It's classic, and although the basic premise is always the same (guy in his underwear, embarrassed, because women are present), the variations are limitless.
DeleteFrom a societal perspective, such scenes are generally supposed to funny. That's almost always the reason for them, and I certainly have always understood the comedic component in such scenes/scenarios. But for me, personally, the erotic emotions evoked by such seemingly innocuous scenarios are decidedly overwhelming. My opinion is likely in the minority, but….whatever. I agree with you entirely, that women, generally, don't view a guy caught in his undies as particularly "sexy." If the women in such scenes ever reacted with a "sexual attraction" to the pantsless guy in question, it would not evoke such emotions. But when the ladies in said situations react with one of the two following (which is almost always the case), the erotic nature of the scene is simply off-the-charts: Laughter/giggling -- OR -- empathy for the poor guy. I think the sense of humiliating vulnerability is a factor.
When she reacts to his unfortunate and embarrassing public circumstances with laughter or stifled giggling, the guy has been reduced to a form of amusement. He's now a spectacle and has been made of fool of by cruel fate, through no fault of his own. Just by being there to witness his angst and embarrassment, she has, without conscious effort, subordinated him to a position of near helplessness and utter vulnerability. Example: If a secretary accidentally walked in on her high-powered boss while he was changing and got an unintended long look of him in his full-cut white briefs, evoking giggling from her, before the boss dives behind his desk in a vain attempt to recover his dignity as well as his pants, that boss would have a hard time giving his secretary orders and correction in the future. The incident, itself, would chip away at his authority position as "boss." Societally, that's just how it is. Unspoken, yet undeniable. If push came to shove, all she'd have to do is give him a gentle reminder of that fateful day or give him a playful wink, and he'd remember the incident with all the humiliating details. She would have the upper hand for the remainder of her employment.
If the women in such scenarios react to the poor guy with empathy, in a sincere effort to assuage his embarrassment and perhaps even rectify the situation, that would be even more humiliating for the guy. Talk about despair! Not only has his worst nightmare come true (in is underwear in front of scores of women), but the living, breathing reasons for his embarrassment (the ladies) are now doing everything they can to restore his dignity with their stoic professionalism. Talk about being emotionally emasculated! YIKES!!! And after it's over, the guy, deep down inside, knows that despite the ladies' kind, well-intentioned efforts to not embarrass him as his public humiliation was unfolding in living color --- when the women are alone, they'll be laughing uncontrollably amongst themselves, recounting his nightmare. Of course any and all "underwear humiliation" is exponentially worse if the guy has to see the women after the incident (classmates, colleagues at work, in-laws, ect).
As a gay guy with this fetish, I find any scene where a guy is pantsed and humiliated to be appealing to some extent.
DeleteBut I admit that I do prefer scenes where a guy’s underwear is exposed in front of other guys, as opposed to in front of girls. And I think that’s because, from my own interpretation, you can usually assume that the reaction of the other guys is based on the type of underwear that they themselves are currently wearing or would be willing to wear at some point.
So, as an example, the guys in the audience who laugh mercilessly at Kirby Morris in this scene are probably doing so because they are wearing boxers and would never be caught dead in briefs. But if you saw a guy whose teasing and laughing was more subdued, you could assume that he may be less willing to mock because he himself either currently has on briefs or sometimes wears briefs.
Of course, you could also wonder if a guy who laughs mercilessly when another guy is seen wearing tighty whities is only laughing so that he does not draw attention to the fact that he also wears tighty whities himself.
As a gay guy with an underwear/pantsing/humiliation fetish, the idea of seeing other guys react to a type of underwear that they see another guy wearing and interpreting their reaction as an indication of their own preferred type of underwear is always interesting and fun for me. So, I’m much more drawn to scenes where guys are pantsed in front of other guys.
Is there a link to this video on youtube? I want to add it to my favorites...
ReplyDeleteDon't think it is on Youtube. Whenever I post a video from my computer it makes it look like a youtube video ... have no idea why.
DeleteIt's noteworthy that the storyline is attributed to two women, according to a cast/crew information listing. They concocted quite an astonishingly humiliating scene for the guy, replete with briefs, a stage, bright lights and a roaring audience, which laughs him off the stage. And of course, the scene would have been watered down had a guy introduced him. His female colleague at the podium is the icing on his night of humiliation. Despite the fact that women seem to often react with a healthy dose of "indifference" or perhaps dismiss such male embarrassment with an eye roll, down deep inside, they indeed know that such a scenario is humiliating beyond belief for the poor guy in question.
ReplyDeleteThis scene is incredible! Poor Kirby! I wonder if he usually wears boxers and was just all out of clean ones that day or if he usually prefers briefs. Also wonder if the bullies pantsed him because they knew he would be wearing briefs (like maybe they saw him changing earlier for gym class) or if they expected him to be wearing boxers and it was just icing on the cake for them that he would be seen by the whole school in Tighty Whities.
ReplyDeleteI wonder how the bullies managed to get his clothes off, since I can't imagine that his suit was easy to pull off, especially the pants, which must've been held up by a belt. That seems like a lot of work that they would've had to do in order to get all of those clothes off of him and get him back out on the stage in his tighty whities, all with just a few seconds to get it done.
ReplyDeleteI also wonder if the bullies knew that he would have on tighty whities or if they expected that he'd be wearing boxers and were surprised to find out that he had on briefs (even if they were probably happy about it, since it would mean that he would likely be even more embarrassed).